Archive for June, 2011

MAN ON A TIGHTROPE (Elia Kazan, 1953)

June 17, 2011

The circus of life, where death continually hovers—a rootless or uprooted existence reflecting realities ranging from the status of refugees who were generated by war’s dislocations, to political upheaval and uncertainties, such as behind the Iron Curtain: these and related themes partially account for the plethora of films set around a circus, or employing the circus as metaphor, in the 1950s: among them, The Greatest Show on Earth (Cecil B. DeMille, 1952), Twilight of a Clown (Ingmar Bergman, 1953), La strada (Federico Fellini, 1954), Lola Montès (Max Ophüls, 1955), Trapeze (Carol Reed, 1956). His gripping Man on a Tightrope, one of Elia Kazan’s best films, is another of these notable works.
     Written by Robert E. Sherwood from the novel by Neil Paterson, for which Paterson’s story “International Incident” served as a blueprint, the plot revolves around Cirkus Cernik, a small Czech circus that aims to cross the border to escape into non-Communist Germany in 1952. This fictional group is based on the actual Circus Brumbach, which succeeded in sneaking out of Communist East Germany, animals and all, in 1950 and whose members have been interwoven with the film’s cast of Hollywood actors.
     Chief among these is Fredric March, who plays brilliantly Karel Cernik, the one-time owner of the circus, the property of his family for generations, who as a result of the Communist takeover of Czechoslovakia has been reduced to managing the circus for the state. No longer is Cernik, a circus clown, supposed to be funny; instead, his performances must embody the Communist Party-line. He is thus driven to engineer the circus’s flight to freedom.
     Cernik must also contend with an unfaithful younger wife and a daughter who is romantically involved with someone of whom he disapproves. This Arthur Millerish melodrama somewhat damages the film, reaching its most embarrassing moment when Cernik slaps wife Zama, who responds that he should have done this much sooner. Oy!. Another problem is that the lyrically explosive Kazan has little talent for the kind of sustained suspenseful adventure that the film requires. Fortunately, his superb black-and-white cinematographer, George Krause, collaborates on images of intense realism bordering on Surrealism, with startling camera angles that analyze relationships within the circus and between the circus and the Communist officials breathing down its neck. Kazan, here, is at the top of his form. He also draws from Richard Boone a splendid portrayal of Krofta, the Communist member of the circus who imperils its escape. One wonders at the extent to which the Cernik-Krofta conflict resonates with Kazan’s own competing loyalties and split political autobiography.
     It had been a year since Kazan’s infamous testimony before the House Un-Anerican Activities Committee, and he is determined to show how evil Soviet-style Communism is in order to justify that testimony. Political evil, alas, has more guises than Kazan was willing to admit to. Regardless, here he made one helluva good film.

B(U)Y THE BOOK

MY BOOK, A Short Chronology of World Cinema, IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE FROM THE SANDS FILMS CINEMA CLUB IN LONDON. USING EITHER OF THE LINKS BELOW, ACCESS THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THIS BOOK, FROM WHICH YOU CAN ORDER ONE OR MORE COPIES OF IT. THANKS.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=16

http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=19

BLONDE VENUS (Josef von Sternberg, 1932)

June 16, 2011

Written by Jules Furthman and S.K. Lauren from a story by Furthman and the director, Josef von Sternberg’s engrossing, heartrending Blonde Venus depicts a trenchant human odyssey brilliantly enacted by Marlene Dietrich in perhaps her finest performance. Among actresses, perhaps only Garbo’s Marguerite Gautier surpasses it and perhaps only Baranovskaya’s Pelageya Vlasova, Falconetti’s Joan and Moreau’s Catherine in Jules et Jim match it. We are addressing here the pinnacle indeed of film acting.
     Moreover, Dietrich’s delicate, deeply affecting Helen Faraday contains some of the most potent and fabulous images of sexual ambiguity—in the “Hot Voodoo” number, even masquerading as species ambiguity!—in all of cinema.
     Ned Faraday (Herbert Marshall, also brilliant) meets Helen, a German entertainer, in an enchanted forest—well, it’s the Black Forest—when she is one of a half-dozen “princesses” who are skinny-dipping in a “magic pool.” (Sternberg’s film is Hollywood B.C., before the production code’s restrictions, although one doesn’t see much through a theatrical curtain of lush, leafy trees.) Cut to New York City, where the Faradays have a little son, Johnny (Dickie Moore’s finest hour), who happily goes to sleep, in their small apartment, hearing for the umpteenth time the family fairy tale based on his parents’ courtship, capped by his mother’s singing for him, in German, a poignant, nostalgic lullaby. Unhappily, chemist Ned is dying of radium-poisoning. To raise the money necessary for him to travel to Germany for life-saving treatment, Helen returns to the stage, initially against Ned’s wishes, and has an affair with millionaire playboy Nick Townsend (Cary Grant, excellent), who after all is as darned good-looking as Cary Grant. Returning home from Germany recovered and discovering how his wife financed his return from the dead, Ned balks; when Helen steals away with Johnny, Ned pursues her, intent on separating them forever. Rather than face the immensity of the loving sacrifice she has made for him, Ned has bitterly projected onto Helen his own sexual self-doubts, replacing her tender reality with a misogynistic image of her. The fairy tale has turned into a nightmare of his own making. (Men!) Now that his mother has become the Toast of Paris on her own, will Johnny be able to reconcile his parents? Can Ned learn to accept the depth of his wife’s undying love?
     Only Bert Glennon’s mediocre black-and-white cinematography and a somewhat sluggish narrative pace detract from Sternberg’s most emotionally overwhelming achievement—a film that is inexhaustible in its capacity to touch the heart it exposes.

B(U)Y THE BOOK

MY BOOK, A Short Chronology of World Cinema, IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE FROM THE SANDS FILMS CINEMA CLUB IN LONDON. USING EITHER OF THE LINKS BELOW, ACCESS THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THIS BOOK, FROM WHICH YOU CAN ORDER ONE OR MORE COPIES OF IT. THANKS.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=16

http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=19

STALAG 17 (Billy Wilder, 1953)

June 15, 2011

Films set in prisoner-of-war camps must contend with the specter of this prison-film subgenre’s masterpiece, Jean Renoir’s La grande illusion (1937), set in a German camp during the First World War. Indeed, Renoir himself discovered this with his later, excellent The Elusive Corporal (1962), which is set in a German prison camp during the Second World War. Of course, there’s a range of quality to these subsequent films: whereas John Sturges’s The Great Escape (1963) is inflated, audience-baiting trash, Billy Wilder’s Stalag 17, from a decade earlier, is not without interest. Much of that interest involves a subtext that refers to McCarthyism and the mob mentality it exploited.
     In 1944, in Barracks 4 of a POW camp, Stalag 17, black marketeer J.J. Sefton is suspected of spying for their German captors when two Americans are almost instantly killed upon their attempted escape. One of their rank indeed helps whip up the frenzy of suspicion against Sefton, attracting our own suspicion, although the betrayer turns out to be someone else. Assisted by Ernest Laszlo’s grim black-and-white cinematography, Wilder’s comedy-drama—the inspiration for TV’s Hogan’s Heroes, which turned everything to farce—evokes the political atmosphere of the U.S. during Senator Joe McCarthy’s reign.
     William Holden, who won the best actor Oscar for playing Sefton, keeps the film from becoming a nasty, sentimental boys’ adventure. Even after Sefton is beaten up by his fellow prisoners, Holden keeps the potential for creepy self-pity at bay. It also helps that the play-derived plot has Sefton coming out of his self-centered shell to become a “team player.” In truth, this is not one of Holden’s great performances; but isn’t it wonderful that such a good actor as he won an Oscar for something?—and work he needn’t have been ashamed of.

B(U)Y THE BOOK

MY BOOK, A Short Chronology of World Cinema, IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE FROM THE SANDS FILMS CINEMA CLUB IN LONDON. USING EITHER OF THE LINKS BELOW, ACCESS THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THIS BOOK, FROM WHICH YOU CAN ORDER ONE OR MORE COPIES OF IT. THANKS.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=16

http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=19

THE MAKIOKA SISTERS (Kon Ichikawa, 1983)

June 14, 2011

Among Kon Ichikawa’s most exquisitely detailed, exacting and poignant films, Sasame-yuki—literally, Fine Snow but called in the U.S. and the UK The Makioka Sisters—opens with long-shots of gorgeous springtime landscapes softened by rain-mists, followed by closeups of cherry blossoms from which petals of rain drop. (A fierce waterfall brings this earlier image to frightening fruition.) Cut to indoors and two of the Makioka sisters, all four of whom have come here to Kyoto from Osaka, as they do every year, to drink in the beauty, mark another year in their lives and, unconsciously, face down the transience of life evidence of which dogs them. Both their parents are deceased, and the family’s finances, once ripe and full, have significantly dwindled, fallen to earth like fragile blossoms. Closeups of the flowers outdoors have been replaced by alternating closeups, indoors, of sisters Sachiko and Taeko. They are squabbling over money: the money set aside for Taeko’s marriage dowry that Taeko wants now for another purpose: to start a doll-making business. Sachiko, who is married, thus upholds tradition, refusing her younger sister, while Taeko cultivates the air of self-determination. It is 1938; Japan has already “raped” Nanking, and World War II, defeat and the mostly U.S. occupation await. Taeko is a look ahead to the future of Japan.
     Ichikawa patiently chronicles the lives of these sisters, creating an elegiac tapestry of Japan’s changing fortunes through the years. His four actresses are all wonderful, as is Jûzô Itami (best supporting actor, Yokohama, and both the Hochi and Kinema Junpo Awards) as sister Tsuruko’s spouse, who bended to necessity by selling the family kimono business: another loss of loveliness.
     Based on the novel by Junichirô Tanizaki, the film captures the spirit of the downward passage of time.

B(U)Y THE BOOK

MY BOOK, A Short Chronology of World Cinema, IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE FROM THE SANDS FILMS CINEMA CLUB IN LONDON. USING EITHER OF THE LINKS BELOW, ACCESS THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THIS BOOK, FROM WHICH YOU CAN ORDER ONE OR MORE COPIES OF IT. THANKS.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=16

http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=19

FAREWELL (Mariya Saakyan, 2004)

June 13, 2011

“Proshchanie,” Mariya Saakyan’s short film, preceded her first feature, Mayak. There is sparse speech, and Saakyan has had Second Run, which produced the film’s DVD (“Proshchanie” appears as an “extra” with Mayak), not provide English subtitles—a decision that augments its impression as a dream. It may also be described as an elegy—one shorn of sentimental lyricism. It is an elegy possessing a hardened edge of lyricism.
     The protagonist—let us name her Mariya—bears a lightly fixed, blank expression. Is she sleep-traveling? Onboard a train at night, Mariya moves through a world of darkness, ambient sounds (whistles, the wheels of the train, etc.) and flickering memories: the boy who used to be her companion; a reason for her leavetaking. Hers is an elegy of romantic loss every piece of which impresses us as present-tense, whether recollected past or actual present.
     Is she dreaming of leaving him because he ended their romance? Regardless, the train ride is interrupted by spooky images, including what appears to be the tunnel drawing of a wide-eyed, upright animal-monster such as Goya might imagine. With its fixed stare, it could be a lost image of herself—the loveless Mariya she left behind.
     Many of the brief shots are of near-total darkness; one, outdoors, is of total darkness sparked by a single point of light.
     A wonderful shot, atypically sustained, finds Mariya perhaps having arrived somewhere. She is being taxied. She appears blacked-out, an opaque shadow. We cannot tell whether she is facing front or back, but we assume she is facing ahead as we watch the moving image of her captivating feeling: the receding road that we glimpse through the vehicle’s back window. Is Mariya losing mental ground?
     Over closing credits of this miniature masterpiece, a haunting melody is hummed.

B(U)Y THE BOOK

MY BOOK, A Short Chronology of World Cinema, IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE FROM THE SANDS FILMS CINEMA CLUB IN LONDON. USING EITHER OF THE LINKS BELOW, ACCESS THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THIS BOOK, FROM WHICH YOU CAN ORDER ONE OR MORE COPIES OF IT. THANKS.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=16

http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Dennis+Grunes&x=14&y=19


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers